Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis: A Practical Guide to Hierarchical Models

This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:

• Comparison and validation of metadta for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
  Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
• Estudios de rendimiento diagnóstico: interpretación del análisis ROC y de los puntos de corte
  Cirugía Española, 2022
• The Moses–Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
• Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: The case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy
  Statistics in Medicine, 2014
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery
  British Journal of Surgery, 2014
• An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
• Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
• The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
• A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations
  Statistics in Medicine, 2001
• Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations
  Statistics in Medicine, 1993