Knowledge and attitudes towards medicinal cannabis and complementary and integrative medicine (CIM): a survey of healthcare professionals working in a cancer hospital in Australia
Open Access
- 11 October 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 31 (11) , 1-10
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated attitudes and practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) to medicinal cannabis (MC) and complementary and integrative medicine (CIM), including individual therapies, such as acupuncture, massage, herbs, dietary supplements, nutrition and exercise. We explored whether healthcare occupation influenced attitudes to CIM and MC; referral pathways for advice on CIM; and interest in a pharmacy service to evaluate herbs and supplements. Methods: Cross-sectional survey. All clinical staff at a comprehensive cancer hospital were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire about CIM and MC. We used descriptive analysis to describe the respondent’s knowledge and attitudes, and Fisher’s exact test to test for differences by occupation, length of time at the hospital and age. Results: Most of the 116 HCPs respondents supported integrating CIM into cancer care (94.8%) and wanted to learn more (90%) and to understand benefits and contraindications. Most respondents believed that CIM (87.9%) could benefit patients with cancer, and MC could benefit those with advanced cancer (49–51%). Whilst just over half (52.6%) felt confident discussing CIM with patients, only 10% felt they had sufficient knowledge to discuss MC. Most felt they did not have sufficient knowledge to specifically discuss mind and body practices (63.8%) or herbs and supplements (79%). HCPs (63%) would be more inclined to allow use of herbs and supplements with cancer treatment if a pharmacy service was available to evaluate interactions. Occupation, length of time at hospital and age influenced confidence and knowledge about CIM. Conclusions: The integration of evidence-based CIM and MC into cancer care is hampered by a lack of knowledge of benefits and contraindications, and gaps in education. Effective and safe integration may require targeted development of services such as pharmacy to evaluate the safety of herbs and supplements, and inclusion of cancer specialists who have received training in individual CIM therapies and MC.Keywords
Funding Information
- Western Sydney University
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication predictors and consequences of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) discussions in oncology visitsPatient Education and Counseling, 2016
- Reasons to Use and Disclose Use of Complementary Medicine Use – An Insight from Cancer PatientsCancer and Clinical Oncology, 2013
- The role of traditional medicine practice in primary health care within Aboriginal Australia: a review of the literatureJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2013
- Lung cancer patients’ beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine in the promotion of their wellnessEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2012
- Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by men in Australian cancer outpatient servicesAnnals of Oncology, 2011
- Beliefs of New Zealand Doctors About Integrative Medicine for Cancer TreatmentIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 2011
- Breast cancer patients' expectations in respect of the physician–patient relationship and treatment management results of a survey of 617 patientsAnnals of Oncology, 2007
- Patient-Physician Communication Regarding Use of Complementary Therapies During Cancer TreatmentJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 2005
- Communication between physicians and cancer patients about complementary and alternative medicine: exploring patients' perspectivesPsycho-Oncology, 2002
- Australian oncologists'self‐reported knowledge and attitudes about non‐traditional therapies used by cancer patientsMedical Journal of Australia, 2000