Entanglement verification and steering when Alice and Bob cannot be trusted
Authors:
- Eric G. CavalcantiECEric G. Cavalcanti
- Michael J. W. HallMHMichael J. W. Hall
- Howard M. WisemanHWHoward M. Wiseman
- 6 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 87 (3)
Abstract
Various protocols exist by which a referee can be convinced that two observers share an entangled resource. Such protocols typically specify the types of communication allowed, and the degrees of trust required, between the referee and each observer. Here it is shown that the need for any degree of trust of the observers by the referee can be completely removed via the referee using classical and quantum communication channels appropriately. In particular, trust-free verification of Bell nonlocality, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, and entanglement, respectively, requires two classical channels, one classical and one quantum channel, and two quantum channels. These channels correspond to suitable inputs of quantum randomness by the referee, which prevent the observers from mimicking entanglement using shared classical randomness. Our results generalize recent work by Buscemi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200401 (2012)], and offer a perspective on the operational significance of that work. They also offer the possibility of simpler experimental demonstrations of the basic idea of quantum-refereed nonlocality tests.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- All Entangled Quantum States Are NonlocalPhysical Review Letters, 2012
- One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steeringPhysical Review A, 2012
- The security of practical quantum key distributionReviews of Modern Physics, 2009
- Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradoxPhysical Review A, 2009
- All Entangled States are Useful for Channel DiscriminationPhysical Review Letters, 2009
- Quantum entanglementReviews of Modern Physics, 2009
- Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, Bell nonlocality, and steeringPhysical Review A, 2007
- Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen ParadoxPhysical Review Letters, 2007
- Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theoremPhysical Review Letters, 1991
- Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable modelPhysical Review A, 1989