On Multiple Wh-Fronting
Author:
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 33 (3) , 351-383
Abstract
I show that multiple wh-fronting languages (MWFL) do not behave uniformly regarding wh-movement and eliminate MWFL from the crosslinguistic typology concerning wh-movement in multiple questions. Regarding when they have wh-movement, MWFL behave like non-MWFL: some behave like English (they always have wh-movement), some like Chinese (they never have it), and some like French (they have it optionally although, as in French, wh-movement is sometimes required). MWFL differ from English, Chinese, and French in that in MWFL even wh-phrases that do not undergo wh-movement still must front for an independent reason, argued to involve focus. The fronting has several exceptions (semantic, phonological, and syntactic in nature), explanation for which leads me to posit a new type of in-situ wh-phrase and argue for the possibility of pronunciation of lower copies of chains.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sideward MovementLinguistic Inquiry, 2001
- Multiple Wh-FrontingLinguistic Inquiry, 2001
- Across‐the‐board Movement and LFSyntax, 2000
- Licensing Wh‐in‐situSyntax, 2000
- Identificational focus versus information focusLanguage, 1998
- Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-CroatianLingua, 1997
- On certain violations of the Superiority Condition, AgrO, and economy of derivationJournal of Linguistics, 1997
- The Balkan Slavic clausal cliticsNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1996
- Syntax outranks phonology: evidence from Ancient GreekPhonology, 1995
- On multiple questions and multiple WH frontingNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1988