Scenic Assessment Methodology for Preserving Scenic Viewsheds of Virginia, USA
Open Access
Abstract
The non-profit organization Scenic Virginia is dedicated to identifying and showcasing the state’s scenic landscapes. Recently, the state incorporated a “scenic” element into its new Conserve Virginia land conservation strategy. Consequently, there is a need for a standardized assessment tool that both citizens and professionals can use to identify and evaluate the scenic value of publicly accessible viewsheds in Virginia. This paper outlines the rationale behind developing a scientifically robust protocol, which is based on an extensive literature review and photographs from Scenic Virginia’s annual photo contest. The protocol serves as a scenic assessment tool designed to encourage local citizen participation in identifying significant scenic resources in Virginia. Local communities will utilize this new tool to help them identify and evaluate their scenic assets. The protocol was reviewed by a panel of experts, and its implementation is currently underway.Keywords
Funding Information
- Scenic Virginia
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A reviewLandscape and Urban Planning, 2019
- Assessment of path choices on a country walk using a virtual environmentLandscape and Urban Planning, 2001
- A Paradigm for Landscape AestheticsEnvironment and Behavior, 1990
- On the possibility of strong versus weak quantification of scenic beauty—a further response to carlsonLandscape Planning, 1986
- Landscape perception: Research, application and theoryLandscape Planning, 1982
- How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapesLandscape Planning, 1977
- Scenic assessment: An overviewLandscape Planning, 1977
- “Natural Landscape Preferences: A Predictive Model”: A ReplyJournal of Leisure Research, 1969
- Processing Ranger and Mariner PhotographyOptical Engineering, 1966
- The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956