Exposure to Sexual Economics Theory Promotes a Hostile View of Heterosexual Relationships
Authors:
- 29 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Vol. 41 (1) , 77-88
Abstract
Proponents of sexual economics theory argue that women exchange sex for men’s resources. This idea is likely to promote a competitive view of gender relationships that undermines gender equality by characterizing women as manipulative and financially dependent on men. Heterosexual college students (N = 474) who were randomly exposed to a popular YouTube video describing sexual economics theory increased their (1) behavioral support for sexual exchange concepts, (2) endorsement of the theory, and (3) adversarial views of heterosexual relationships, compared with a control group of students. Sexual exchange theory endorsement and adversarial heterosexual beliefs positively covaried, and both attitudes were related to participants’ sexism. Reading a critique of sexual exchange theory, that emphasized mutual respect and affection as precursors to heterosexual intimacy, counteracted the consequences of exposure to the theory. The findings provide evidence that disseminating sexual exchange theory via video on the Internet negatively affects young adults’ views of gender relationships. Educators, and others who wish to explore sexual economics theory through the use of this video, should also include a discussion of the countervailing evidence available. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Motivates the Sexual Double Standard? More Support for Male Versus Female Control TheoryPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2013
- Men and women are from Earth: Examining the latent structure of gender.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013
- MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysisBehavior Research Methods, 2012
- Sex on the Brain?: An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social DesirabilityThe Journal of Sex Research, 2012
- “You Owe Me”: Effects of Date Cost, Who Pays, Participant Gender, and Rape Myth Beliefs on Perceptions of RapeJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2010
- Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate SelectionEuropean Sociological Review, 2010
- Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarityJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2008
- From Sex to Sexuality: Exposing the Heterosexual Script on Primetime Network TelevisionThe Journal of Sex Research, 2007
- A Prospective Analysis of Sexual Assault PerpetrationJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2005
- The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward WomenPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997