The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
Authors:
Open Access
- 11 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Biology & Philosophy
- Vol. 35 (5) , 1-42
Abstract
The zone of latent solutions (ZLS) hypothesis provides an alternative approach to explaining cultural patterns in primates and many other animals. According to the ZLS hypothesis, non-human great ape (henceforth: ape) cultures consist largely or solely of latent solutions. The current competing (and predominant) hypothesis for ape culture argues instead that at least some of their behavioural or artefact forms are copied through specific social learning mechanisms (“copying social learning hypothesis”) and that their forms may depend on copying (copying-dependent forms). In contrast, the ape ZLS hypothesis does not require these forms to be copied. Instead, it suggests that several (non-form-copying) social learning mechanisms help determine the frequency (but typically not the form) of these behaviours and artefacts within connected individuals. The ZLS hypothesis thus suggests that increases and stabilisations of a particular behaviour’s or artefact’s frequency can derive from socially-mediated (cued) form reinnovations. Therefore, and while genes and ecology play important roles as well, according to the ape ZLS hypothesis, apes typically acquire the forms of their behaviours and artefacts individually, but are usually socially induced to do so (provided sufficient opportunity, necessity, motivation and timing). The ZLS approach is often criticized—perhaps also because it challenges the current null hypothesis, which instead assumes a requirement of form-copying social learning mechanisms to explain many ape behavioural (and/or artefact) forms. However, as the ZLS hypothesis is a new approach, with less accumulated literature compared to the current null hypothesis, some confusion is to be expected. Here, we clarify the ZLS approach—also in relation to other competing hypotheses—and address misconceptions and objections. We believe that these clarifications will provide researchers with a coherent theoretical approach and an experimental methodology to examine the necessity of form-copying variants of social learning in apes, humans and other species.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (ZUK 63)
- European Research Council (714658)
- Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
This publication has 144 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neandertals made the first specialized bone tools in EuropeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
- Community-specific evaluation of tool affordances in wild chimpanzeesScientific Reports, 2011
- Selective attention to philopatric models causes directed social learning in wild vervet monkeysProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culturePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2009
- A potent effect of observational learning on chimpanzee tool constructionProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2009
- De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finchNature, 2009
- Studying cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratoryPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2008
- Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human languageProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Social diffusion of novel foraging methods in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- 4,300-Year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technologyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007