COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CLINICAL EFFECT OF ACENOCOUMAROL (SINTROM®) AND PHENPROCOUMON (MARCOUMAR®) IN MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND ANGINA PECTORIS
Authors:
- 12 January 1971
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Acta Medica Scandinavica
- Vol. 190 (1-6) , 535-540
Abstract
A controlled clinical trial was performed in more than 250 patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris to determine whether any difference in clinical effect could be observed between acenocoumarol (Sintrom®) and phenprocoumon (Marcoumar®). The average observation period was almost three years. For the myocardial infarction group (both with and without relative contraindications) there proved to be a small but significant difference in the stability of the hypocoagulability of these two coumarin preparations: phenprocoumon gave the most stable results. Judging from the mortality, morbidity, and the number and severity of the bleeding complications, however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups treated with these two anticoagulants. The favourable results obtained in this study with the short‐acting acenocoumarol are based on the strict supervision of patients on prolonged anticoagulant treatment provided by the Netherlands Thrombosis Service, in which the control by nurses plays an important role.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY CONCERNING THE STABILITY OF THE ANTICOAGULANT EFFECT OF ACENOCOUMAROL AND PHENPROCOUMONActa Medica Scandinavica, 1969
- A Double‐blind Trial of Long‐term Anticoagulant Treatment after Myocardial InfarctionActa Medica Scandinavica, 1967
- How Effective Is Clinical Control of Anticoagulant Therapy?Postgraduate Medicine, 1965
- PHENPROCOUMON, DIPHENADIONE, WARFARIN AND BISHYDROXYCOUMARINThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1964
- Five-Year Study of AnticoagulantsAngiology, 1962
- EXPERIENCE WITH THE ANTICOAGULANT, MARCUMARAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1957