Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement

This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:

• Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
• Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Function
  Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
• Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) – validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement
  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2003
• Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee
  Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
• Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
  Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
• Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement
  Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2001
• The Effect of Age on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
  Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
• Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the Short-Form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients
  Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
• Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.
  Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1996
• The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
  Medical Care, 1992