Pharmacovigilance Practices by Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study
Authors:
- Hadeel AlkofideHAHadeel Alkofide
- Haya M. AlmalagHAHaya M. Almalag
- Mashael AlromaihMAMashael Alromaih
- Lama AlotaibiLALama Alotaibi
- Njoud AltuwaijriNANjoud Altuwaijri
- Noha Al AloolaNANoha Al Aloola
- Jawza F. AlsabhanJAJawza F. Alsabhan
- Ghada A. BawazeerGBGhada A. Bawazeer
- Lobna Al JuffaliLJLobna Al Juffali
- Rihaf AlfarajRARihaf Alfaraj
- Nora AlkhudairNANora Alkhudair
- Raniah AljadeedRARaniah Aljadeed
Open Access
- 26 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 17 (6) , 683
Abstract
Investigating pharmacovigilance (PV) practices among oncology healthcare providers (HCPs) is crucial for patient safety in oncology settings. This study aimed to assess the awareness, attitudes, and practices towards PV and identify barriers to effective adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting for HCPs working in oncology-related settings. Employing a cross-sectional survey design, we collected data from 65 HCPs, focusing on their experiences with ADR reporting, education on ADR management, and familiarity with PV protocols. The results showed that about half of the responders were pharmacists. Around 58.9% of the respondents reported ADRs internally, and 76.9% had received some form of ADR-related education. However, only 38.5% were aware of formal ADR review procedures. Methotrexate and paclitaxel emerged as the drugs most frequently associated with ADRs. The complexity of cancer treatments was among the common reasons for the low reporting of ADRs by the study participants. The findings highlight the need for enhanced PV education and standardized reporting mechanisms to improve oncology care. We conclude that reinforcing PV training and streamlining ADR-reporting processes are critical to optimizing patient outcomes and safety in oncology, advocating for targeted educational interventions and the development of unified PV guidelines.Keywords
Funding Information
- Researcher Supporting Project (RSPD 2024R 1019) of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (RSPD 2024R 1019)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in reporting of randomised clinical trials in oncologyEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2016
- Chemotherapy-induced adverse drug reactions in oncology patients: A prospective observational surveyIndian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2016
- Pattern of adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy in a tertiary care hospital in South IndiaPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2015
- Adverse reactions to oncologic drugs: spontaneous reporting and signal detectionExpert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, 2014
- Challenges to and the future of medication safety in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative studySaudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 2014
- Pharmacovigilance in oncology: evaluation of current practice and future perspectivesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2014
- Underreporting in pharmacovigilance: an intervention for Italian GPs (Emilia–Romagna region)European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012
- Reporting of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions of Targeted Anticancer Agents in Pivotal Phase III Clinical TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Physicians??? Attitudes and Adverse Drug Reaction ReportingDrug Safety, 2005
- Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological PerspectivesRisk Analysis, 1998