China’s Accession to the WTO as a Shock to Residents’ Health—A Difference-in-Difference Approach
Open Access
- 9 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 19 (22) , 14728
Abstract
The impact of regional trade shocks on population health has been a topic of interest in health economics in recent years. Unfortunately, there are few studies directly discussing the impact of regional trade shocks caused by China’s WTO accession on the health of Chinese residents, which is essential to explore the connection between a country´s opening to international trade and the health of its residents. Taking China’s accession to the WTO as a quasi-natural experiment, based on the micro individual samples of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) from 1993 to 2011, this paper, for the first time, studies the impact of regional tariff uncertainty caused by China’s accession to the WTO on the health of Chinese residents and its mechanisms by adopting the Difference-in-Difference (DID) model. The study finds that compared with the areas initially facing low tariff uncertainty, the areas with high initial tariff uncertainty have a greater negative impact on the health of residents after China acceded to WTO, which means that the trade shock caused damage to the health of residents. After a series of tests on the effectiveness and robustness of DID, this conclusion is still valid. The impact of the trade shock on residents’ health varies with the type of residence, gender, and geographical location, and there is a nonlinear relationship. Further mechanism tests show that the trade shock has worsened the health status of residents through rural migration channels, working hours channels, and pollution emission channels. This study provides micro evidence for objectively evaluating the health effects of trade shock and has important implication for considering the health loss of Chinese residents in the process of trade liberalization.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China “The welfare effect estimation of the Belt and Road construction” (71773141)
- Hubei Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research Plan Guidance Project (B2021175)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Soap Operas and Fertility: Evidence from BrazilAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2012
- Changes in compulsory schooling and the causal effect of education on health: Evidence from GermanyJournal of Health Economics, 2011
- Subjective health and its relationship with working time variables and job stressors: Sequence or general factor model?Work & Stress, 2010
- Globalization and Working Time: Working Hours and Flexibility in GermanyPolitics & Society, 2009
- Does trade openness improve environmental quality?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2009
- Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from IndonesiaAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery winsJournal of Health Economics, 2007
- Does trade affect child health?Journal of Health Economics, 2006
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Trade Liberalisation and Wage Inequality: Lessons from the Mexican ExperienceThe World Economy, 2000