Doctors’ understanding of individualisation of drug treatments: a qualitative interview study
Authors:
Open Access
Abstract
Objective To explore doctors’ understanding of individualisation of drug treatments, and identify the methods used to achieve individualisation. Design In this exploratory study, we used in-depth qualitative interviews with doctors to gain insight into their understanding of the term ‘individualised treatments’ and the methods that they use to achieve it. Participants 16 general practitioners in 6 rural and 10 urban practices, 2 geriatricians and 2 clinical academics were recruited. Setting Primary and secondary care in South West of England. Results Understanding of individualisation varied between doctors, and their initial descriptions of individualisation were not always consistent with subsequent examples of the patients they had treated. Understandings of, and methods used to achieve, individualised treatment were frequently discussed in relation to making drug treatment decisions. Few doctors spoke of using strategies to support patients to individualise their own treatments after the consultation. Conclusions Despite its widespread use, variation in doctors’ understanding of the term individualisation highlights the need for it to be defined. Efforts are needed to develop effective methods that would offer a structured approach to support patients to manage their treatments after consultations.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- GPs' considerations in multimorbidity management: a qualitative studyBritish Journal of General Practice, 2012
- Courteous but not curious: how doctors' politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultationsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2011
- Shared decision making: trade-offs between narrower and broader conceptionsHealth Expectations, 2011
- Supporting patients to make the best decisionsBMJ, 2011
- Whatever suits you: unpicking personalization for the NHSJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2010
- Shared Decision Making, Paternalism and Patient ChoiceHealth Care Analysis, 2009
- Evidence‐Based Medicine, Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects, and the Trouble with AveragesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- Paternalism or partnership?BMJ, 1999
- Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients?The Lancet, 1999
- Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative researchBMJ, 1995