Training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of the LMA‐ProSeal and the LMA‐Classic in an airway management manikin
- 7 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Anesthesia
- Vol. 16 (10) , 1028-1031
Abstract
Summary: Background : Neonatal resuscitation is a mandatory skill for healthcare professionals involved in maternity suites. For ethical reasons, it is impossible to teach and practice airway management skills on neonates, and manikins are used for this purpose. The Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway TM (cLMA) is accepted as an effective device for airway management during neonatal resuscitation. A neonatal size of the LMA‐ProSealTM (PLMA) was recently produced, but there are no comparative data on its performance. We describe the comparison of the performances of the neonatal cLMA and the neonatal PLMA when used by different healthcare professionals in a dedicated airway management manikin.Methods : Thirty‐five healthcare professionals, were given a brief description of the two devices followed by 15 min of supervised insertions on a single manikin. Every trainee was then instructed to insert both devices four times. The time from insertion to the first inflation of the artificial lungs (insertion time, IT) was recorded by a single unblinded observer.Results : No failed insertions were recorded. The success rates of the first attempt were higher with the PLMA than the cLMA (97.1% vs 92.1%; P < 0.01). The mean ± sd (range) IT was significantly lower with the cLMA compared with the PLMA [10.47 ± 2.85 (6–22) s vs 11.34 ± 2.5 (7–18) s; P < 0.01]. The mean ± sd (range) IT of the cLMA was 12.31 ± 3.54 (7–22) s for the first positioning and 9.2 ± 2.34 (6–16) s for the fourth (P < 0.01). The mean ± sd (range) IT of the PLMA was 12.71 ± 2.52 (8–18) s for the first positioning and 10.17 ± 2.28 (7–14) s for the fourth (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences among groups.Conclusions : Both LMAs are easy to insert by different delivery‐room workers. PLMA (with the introducer tool) has a higher success rate at first attempt than cLMA. Manikin ventilation was established equally without difference in performance among doctors, nurses, midwives. A brief manikin‐training reduces the IT significantly. The longer IT of PLMA vs cLMA is without clinical relevance.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation GuidelinesCirculation, 2005
- Laryngeal mask airway: is the management of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth changing?Resuscitation, 2004
- Manikin training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airwayPediatric Anesthesia, 2004
- A Multicenter Study Comparing the ProSeal TMand Classic TMLaryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized, Nonparalyzed PatientsAnesthesiology, 2002
- The ProSeal Laryngeal Mask AirwayAnesthesiology, 2000
- The LMA ‘ProSeal’—a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal ventBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000
- An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on ResuscitationPediatrics, 1999
- The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysisCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Neonatal Resuscitation Using the Laryngeal Mask AirwayAnesthesiology, 1994
- Use of the layngeal mask airway in neonatal resuscitationAnaesthesia, 1993