Understanding human enhancement technologies through critical phenomenology
- 30 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Nursing Philosophy
- Vol. 20 (1) , e12229
Abstract
Human enhancement technologies raise serious ethical questions about health practices no longer content simply to treat disease, but which now also propose to “optimize” human beings’ physical, cognitive and psychological abilities. These technologies call for a reassessment of our relationship to health, the human body and the body's organic, identity and social functions. In nursing, such considerations are in their infancy. In this paper, we argue for the relevance of critical phenomenology as a way to better understand the ethical issues related to human enhancement technologies (HET). In so doing, we seek to problematize HET and assess their influence on the future development of nursing science and practice. It is difficult to anticipate the concrete effects of HET, we suggest, because these practices reconfigure the meaning of normativity and disorient our conventional ethical landscape. In this context, we argue that the later work of Martin Heidegger and Michel Foucault invites a critical perspective into how techno‐scientific discourses modify our relationship to care, to health and to our own social and corporeal identities. Despite the traditional philosophical opposition between phenomenology and critical theory, we maintain that a hybrid critical phenomenological approach opens new ways to assess the integration of technology and practice. Our analysis understands HET as a process of “hybridization” between technological objects and human subjects. Critical phenomenology thus effectively questions anthropocentric definitions of technology, challenges the dichotomy between curative treatment and enhancement and, finally, prompts valuable reflection on the implications of HET for nursing theory and practice.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ordre des infirmières et des infirmiers du Québec-Ministère de l'éducation et de l'enseignement supérieur du Québec (LP 418 821 855 CA)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive EnhancementNeuroethics, 2013
- First-in-Human Testing of a Wirelessly Controlled Drug Delivery MicrochipScience Translational Medicine, 2012
- “Doctor, Would You Prescribe a Pill to Help Me … ?” A National Survey of Physicians on Using Medicine for Human EnhancementThe American Journal of Bioethics, 2011
- Chapitre 5. Le « dopage cognitif » : signification et enjeuxJournal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences, 2011
- Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativityJournal of Medical Ethics, 2010
- Governmentality, Biopower, and the Debate over Genetic EnhancementThe Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 2009
- Heidegger's Essentialist Responses to the Challenge of TechnologyCanadian Journal of Political Science, 2007
- Agents of care and agents of the state: bio‐power and nursing practiceJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2005
- Concerning technology: thinking with HeideggerNursing Philosophy, 2004
- When Norms Normalize: The Case of Genetic "Enhancement"Human Gene Therapy, 2001