What Evidence Supports the Use of Computerized Alerts and Prompts to Improve Clinicians' Prescribing Behavior?
Open Access
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 16 (4) , 531-538
Abstract
Alerts and prompts represent promising types of decision support in electronic prescribing to tackle inadequacies in prescribing. A systematic reviewKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a Computer‐Based Reminder to Improve Sedative–Hypnotic Prescribing in Older Hospitalized PatientsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007
- Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007
- Prescribers' Responses to Alerts During Medication Ordering in the Long Term Care SettingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006
- Considering the impact of medicine label design characteristics on patient safetyErgonomics, 2006
- Improving Acceptance of Computerized Prescribing Alerts in Ambulatory CareJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006
- The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): Empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at VanderbiltJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2005
- The Effect of Automated Alerts on Provider Ordering Behavior in an Outpatient SettingPLOS Medicine, 2005
- Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to successBMJ, 2005
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- The epidemiology of preventable adverse drug events: A review of the literatureWiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2003