“Do you consider animal welfare to be important?” activating cognitive dissonance via value activation can promote vegetarian choices
Authors:
- Emily P. BouwmanEBEmily P. Bouwman
- Jan Willem BolderdijkJBJan Willem Bolderdijk
- Marleen C. OnwezenMOMarleen C. Onwezen
- Danny TaufikDTDanny Taufik
Open Access
- 15 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Vol. 83
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based dietAppetite, 2015
- The Psychology of Eating AnimalsCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2014
- The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviourJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2013
- The Nature of Psychological Reactance Revisited: A Meta-Analytic ReviewHuman Communication Research, 2012
- Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidanceAppetite, 2012
- The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animalsAppetite, 2010
- Consequences of discrepant explicit and implicit attitudes: Cognitive dissonance and increased information processingJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008
- Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Attribute InformationJournal of Marketing Research, 2005
- Ambivalence towards meatAppetite, 2004
- On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994