Shear and normal stress measurements in non-Brownian monodisperse and bidisperse suspensions
Preprint
Abstract
There was an error in data reduction, resulting in incorrect values for the normal stress differences $N_1$ and $N_2$ shown in Figs. 7-10, and the corrected figures are shown here. In particular, the algebraic sign of $N_1$ is changed, as are the relative magnitudes of $N_1$ and $N_2$. The negative values of $N_1$ for these non-shear-thickening suspensions are larger in magnitude than those reported by other workers, but both $N_1$ and $N_2$ are in general agreement with the accelerated Stokesian Dynamics calculations of Sierou and Brady [1].
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Size-dependent reinforcement of composite rubbersPolymer, 2015
- Analytically predicting the viscosity of hard sphere suspensions from the particle size distributionJournal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2015
- Non-colloidal suspensions: Relations between theory and experiment in shearing flowsJournal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2015
- Random close packing and relative viscosity of multimodal suspensionsRheologica Acta, 2011
- Relative viscosity of bimodal suspensionsKorea-Australia Rheology Journal, 2011
- Viscosity of concentrated noncolloidal bidisperse suspensionsRheologica Acta, 2001
- Bimodal model of slurry viscosity with application to coal-slurries. Part 2. High shear limit behaviorRheologica Acta, 1989
- Rheology of concentrated disperse systems and minimum energy dissipation principleRheologica Acta, 1977
- The measurement of normal-stress differences using a cone- and-plate total thrust apparatusRheologica Acta, 1968
- The viscosity of a concentrated suspension of spherical particlesJournal of Colloid Science, 1951