Body habitus considerations in US anatomical body donation programs—Perspectives and practices from program guidelines
Open Access
- 4 November 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anatomical Sciences Education
- Vol. 19 (1) , 85-92
Abstract
Many US body donation programs impose restrictions on donations based on body size. To examine the body habitus criteria related to body weight, height, proportion, and other size factors in United States body donation programs (USBDP), 127 USBDP publicly available websites listed by the University of Florida were reviewed. Since this study focuses on publicly available website information, it may not capture the characteristics of all programs. Eleven percent of the USBDP websites with public‐facing criteria exclusively listed numeric restrictions, while 24.4% included both descriptive and quantitative (numeric) terminology. The majority of websites with public‐facing criteria (90.6%) imposed a weight‐related restriction, with 55.1% providing descriptive (i.e., non‐numeric) terms. The most common body mass index (BMI) cutoff (30 kg/m 2 ) could disqualify some U.S. adults from donating, as the average BMI in the United States for adult females is 29.8 and for adult males is 29.4. Fourteen programs offered explanations of their descriptive or numeric weight/BMI restrictions. As language evolves to better describe and reflect body habitus, keeping up to date with best practice and community preferences may help when designing donor criteria. Public‐facing information about body habitus criteria for donation may limit the representativeness of body habitus used in anatomical education and research. The implications of this on anatomical education and weight bias in students require more research.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human body donation programs best practices and recommended standards: A task force report from the American Association for AnatomyAnatomical Sciences Education, 2024
- Investigating the status of whole‐body donation across the United States of AmericaAnatomical Sciences Education, 2024
- What words should we use to talk about weight? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies examining preferences for weight‐related terminologyObesity Reviews, 2020
- The “difficult” cadaver: weight bias in the gross anatomy labMedical Education Online, 2020
- Addressing Medical Students’ Negative Bias Toward Patients With Obesity Through Ethics EducationAMA Journal of Ethics, 2018
- Organ Donation and the Principles of Gift LawClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2018
- Population representation among anatomical donors and the implication for medical student educationClinical Anatomy, 2017
- Weight bias reduction in health professionals: a systematic reviewClinical Obesity, 2016
- Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern eraAnatomy & Cell Biology, 2015
- Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: The medical student CHANGES studyObesity, 2013