Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas
Top Cited Papers
- 3 April 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review
- Vol. 29 (2) , 248-263
Abstract
Oscar Larsson’s (2015) essay condemns discursive institutionalism for the “sin” of subjectivism. In reality, however, discursive institutionalism emphasizes the intersubjective nature of ideas through its theorization of agents’ “background ideational abilities” and “foreground discursive abilities.” It also avoids relativism by means of Wittgenstein’s distinction between experiences of everyday life and pictures of the world. Contrary to Larsson, what truly separates post-structuralism from discursive institutionalism is the respective approaches’ theorization of the relationship of power to ideas, with discursive institutionalists mainly focused on persuasive power through ideas, while post-structuralists focus on the structural power in ideas or on coercive power over ideas.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discursive Institutionalism2012
- Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformationCritical Policy Studies, 2011
- Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism2010
- The Idea of Power and the Role of IdeasPolitical Studies Review, 2010
- Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’European Political Science Review, 2010
- The Path‐dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain DistinctSocial Policy & Administration, 2004
- Values and Discourse in the Politics of Adjustment2000
- International Norm Dynamics and Political ChangeInternational Organization, 1998
- Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice1993
- Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordinationInternational Organization, 1992