Exploring the performance of protected areas in alleviating future human pressure
- 23 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in AMBIO
- Vol. 53 (9) , 1323-1335
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) are effective in mitigating human pressures, yet their future pressure alleviating effects remain unclear. In this study, we employed the ConvLSTM model to forecast the future human footprint and analyzed human pressure trends using Theil–Sen median and Mann–Kendall tests. We further evaluated the mitigating effects of PAs within their buffer zones (1–10 km) and the contributions of different IUCN categories of PAs to mitigating human pressure using linear regression models. The results indicate that by 2035, the average human pressure value is expected to increase by 11%, with trends exhibiting a polarized pattern. Furthermore, PAs also effectively mitigate human pressure within their 1 km buffer zones. Different categories of PAs vary in their effectiveness in mitigating human pressure, and stricter conservation areas are not always the most effective. This study can offer insights for evaluating the effectiveness of PAs in reducing human pressure and advocate for their targeted management in urban areas.Keywords
Funding Information
- Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (KYCX22_1102)
- Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (164120322)
- Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (22YJA760075)
- National Forestry and Grassland Administration (2021LYYB02)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capturing urban recreational hotspots from GPS data: A new framework in the lens of spatial heterogeneityComputers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2023
- Effectiveness in protected areas at resisting development pressures in ChinaApplied Geography, 2022
- Strictly protected areas are not necessarily more effective than areas in which multiple human uses are permittedAMBIO, 2020
- Human presence and human footprint have non-equivalent effects on wildlife spatiotemporal habitat useBiological Conservation, 2020
- Analysis and Prediction of Groundwater Level Trends Using Four Variations of Mann Kendall Tests and ARIMA ModellingJournal of the Geological Society of India, 2019
- The role of protected areas in mitigating human impact in the world’s last wilderness areasAMBIO, 2019
- Spatio-temporal analysis of the human footprint in South Ecuador: Influence of human pressure on ecosystems and effectiveness of protected areasApplied Geography, 2017
- Linear valuation without OLS: the Theil-Sen estimation approachReview of Accounting Studies, 2014
- Convention on Biological Diversity: a review of national challenges and opportunities for implementationBiodiversity and Conservation, 2011
- A Global Analysis of Protected Area Management EffectivenessEnvironmental Management, 2010