Measurement characteristics of WHODAS 2.0 and WHODAS-Child: a systematic review of global psychometric studies in specific populations since 2010
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 January 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Vol. 17
Abstract
Introduction: This global systematic review evaluated the psychometric properties, namely the reliability and validity, of all WHODAS 2.0 versions and forms, including WHODAS-Child, which has been used in specific populations since 2010, in assessing alignment with the WHO manual. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA-COSMIN guideline, electronic databases and a curated personal library were searched up to April 30, 2025. Included were 143 empirical studies on WHODAS 2.0 and WHODAS-Child in samples with specific populations, spanning 43 countries. Results: Across five data extraction forms, the mean and median values of the aggregated data regarding the measurement characteristics of WHODAS 2.0 and WHODAS-Child are reported. The 36-item version demonstrated excellent internal consistency (mean α = 0.92), while the 12-item one showed good reliability (mean α = 0.88), and the test-retest reliability was strong for both (ICC = 0.89–0.91). Factor analyses supported the six-domain structure for the 36-item version and WHODAS-Child, though more variability was noted for the 12-item version. Cultural and age-related challenges emerged, indicating the need for contextual adaptations. Discussion and conclusions: The results showed good behavior of WHODAS 2.0, albeit slightly lower than the psychometric profiles described in the Manual. WHODAS-Child, though promising, requires further validation and refinement, particularly for cross-cultural applications.Keywords
This publication has 163 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is it time to rethink disability assessment in low back pain? Reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the Brazilian WHODAS 2.0 for chronic low back painPhysiotherapy Research International, 2023
- Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinicJournal of Anesthesia, 2020
- Validation of the 36‐item and 12‐item self‐report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS‐II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorderAutism Research, 2019
- Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidityInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2018
- Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12-item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum womenInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2018
- Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck diseaseRheumatology International, 2017
- Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2 in preoperative patientsJournal of Anesthesia, 2017
- Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samplesInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2016
- Making assessment locally relevant: measuring functioning for maternal depression in Khayelitsha, Cape TownSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2015
- The Global Assessment ScaleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1976