Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Vol. 31 (3) , 369-409
Abstract
The authors tested three hypotheses from social dominance theory in four cultures: (a) that individual differences in social dominance orientation (SDO), or the preference for group-based inequality, can be reliably measured in societies that are group-based hegemonies; (b) that SDO correlates positively with attitudes supporting hegemonic groups and correlates negatively with attitudes supporting oppressed groups; and (c) that men are higher on SDO than women. For the most part, the results confirmed the hypotheses. SDO scales were internally reliable and were administered in English, Chinese, and Hebrew. SDO scores correlated with sexism, measured in culturally appropriate ways, in every culture, and with ethnic prejudice and other attitudes concerning the local hegemony except in China. Men were higher on SDO than women in most samples. Findings are discussed in terms of ideological and psychological facilitators of group dominance.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Other “Authoritarian Personality”1998
- Sanctioned identities: Legal constructions of modern personhoodIdentities, 1995
- Ethnicity, Religion and Class in Israeli Society1991
- Authoritarianism and Group Identification: A New View of an Old ConstructPolitical Psychology, 1989
- Social Cognition and Social PerceptionAnnual Review of Psychology, 1987
- Development and Validation of the Sexist Attitudes Toward Women Scale (SATWS)Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980
- Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group PositionThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1958
- The Role of Women in a Changing Navaho SocietyAmerican Anthropologist, 1957
- Frustration and aggression.1939