Anal sphincter motor unit potential (MUP) differences between sides, between rest and voluntary contraction, and between MUP analysis programs in normal subjects

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:

• Neurophysiological testing in anorectal disorders
  Muscle & Nerve, 2005
• Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence
  Gut, 2005
• Bilateral vs. unilateral electromyographic examination of the external anal sphincter muscle
  Neurophysiologie Clinique, 2004
• Decomposition‐based quantitative electromyography: Methods and initial normative data in five muscles
  Muscle & Nerve, 2003
• Electromyography of the anal sphincter: Which muscle to examine?
  Muscle & Nerve, 2003
• Fecal incontinence1,2 1Abbreviations used in this paper: EMG, electromyography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound. 2The author thanks Dr. M. Camilleri for reviewing the manuscript, Dr. J. G. Fletcher for assisting with figures, and Deborah Frank for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
  Gastroenterology, 2003
• Quantitative anal sphincter EMG in multisystem atrophy and 100 controls
  Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2001
• Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: Uniformity of the muscle
  Muscle & Nerve, 1999
• Standardisation of anal sphincter EMG: high and low threshold motor units
  Clinical Neurophysiology, 1999
• American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques
  Gastroenterology, 1999