Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
Open Access
- 8 May 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 18 (1) , 598
Abstract
We assessed the effectiveness of three interventions that were aimed to reduce non-acute low back pain (LBP) related symptoms in the occupational health setting. Based on a survey (n = 2480; response rate 71%) on LBP, we selected a cohort of 193 employees who reported moderate LBP (Visual Analogue Scale VAS > 34 mm) and fulfilled at least one of the following criteria during the past 12 months: sciatica, recurrence of LBP ≥ 2 times, LBP ≥ 2 weeks, or previous sickness absence. A random sample was extracted from the cohort as a control group (Control, n = 50), representing the natural course of LBP. The remaining 143 employees were invited to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of three 1:1:1 allocated parallel intervention arms: multidisciplinary rehabilitation (Rehab, n = 43); progressive exercises (Physio, n = 43) and self-care advice (Advice, n = 40). Seventeen employees declined participation in the intervention. The primary outcome measures were physical impairment (PHI), LBP intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), health related quality of life (QoL), and accumulated sickness absence days. We imputed missing values with multiple imputation procedure. We assessed all comparisons between the intervention groups and the Control group by analysing questionnaire outcomes at 2 years with ANOVA and sickness absence at 4 years by using negative binomial model with a logarithmic link function. Mean differences between the Rehab and Control groups were − 3 [95% CI -5 to − 1] for PHI, − 13 [− 24 to − 1] for pain intensity, and 0.06 [0.00 to 0.12] for QoL. Mean differences between the Physio and Control groups were − 3 [95% CI -5 to − 1] for PHI, − 13 [− 29 to 2] for pain intensity, and 0.07 [0.01 to 0.13] for QoL. The main effects sizes were from 0.4 to 0.6. The interventions were not effective in reducing sickness absence. Rehab and Physio interventions improved health related quality of life, decreased low back pain and physical impairment in non-acute, moderate LBP, but we found no differences between the Advice and Control group results. No effectiveness on sickness absence was observed. Number NCT00908102 Clinicaltrials.govKeywords
Funding Information
- Työsuojelurahasto (114047)
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2011
- The patient-specific functional scale is more responsive than the Roland Morris disability questionnaire when activity limitation is lowEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Measuring the global burden of low back painBest Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- How do we define the condition ‘recurrent low back pain’? A systematic reviewEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual careEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation for Subacute Low Back Pain: Graded Activity or Workplace Intervention or Both?Spine, 2007
- Substantial sick-leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non-specific sub-acute low back painEuropean Spine Journal, 2006
- The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational healthcareOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2006
- Information and Advice to Patients With Back Pain Can Have a Positive EffectSpine, 1999
- A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disabilityPain, 1993