Risk Factors for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Explantation and Erosion in Male Nonneurological Patients
Authors:
- Alice PitoutAPAlice Pitout
- Pierre LecoanetPLPierre Lecoanet
- Charles MazeaudCharles Mazeaud
- Victor GaillardVGVictor Gaillard
- Thibault TricardTTThibault Tricard
- Christian SaussineCSChristian Saussine
- Thibaut BrierreTBThibaut Brierre
- Xavier GameXGXavier Game
- Xavier BiardeauXBXavier Biardeau
- Franck BruyereFBFranck Bruyere
Open Access
- 30 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Korean Continence Society in International Neurourology Journal
- Vol. 28 (2) , 147-155
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to assess the risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) explantation in a large multicenter cohort.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for all 1,233 implantations of the AMS-800 AUS device in male nonneurological patients from 2005 to 2020 across 13 French centers. Patients with neurological conditions were excluded from the study. To identify factors associated with explantation-free survival, survival analysis was performed. Explantation was defined as the complete removal of the device, whereas revision referred to the replacement of the device or its components.Results: The study included 1,107 patients, of whom 281 underwent AUS explantation. The median survival without explantation was 83 months. The leading causes of explantation were infection and erosion. Univariate analysis revealed several significant risk factors for explantation: age above 75 years (34.6% in the explanted group vs. 25.8% in the nonexplanted group, P=0.007), history of radiotherapy (43.5% vs. 31.3%, P=0.001), and anticoagulant use (15% vs. 8.6%, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the only significant risk factor was previous radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed 2 factors associated with earlier explantation: transcorporal cuff implantation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; P=0.01) and the annual caseload of the center (HR, 1.08; P=0.02). When specifically examining explantation due to erosion, radiotherapy was the sole factor significantly associated with the risk of erosion (OR, 2.47; P<0.05) as well as earlier erosion (HR, 1.90; P=0.039).Conclusions: In this series, conducted in a real-world setting across multiple centers with different volumes and levels of expertise, the median survival without AUS explantation was 83 months. This study confirms that radiotherapy represents the primary independent risk factor for AUS erosion in male nonneurological patients.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Stress Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy or Benign Prostatic Obstruction Surgery: Results of a Large Multicentric StudyEuropean Urology Focus, 2022
- Impact of radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients: A multicenter studyNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2021
- Transcorporal vs. bulbar artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with fragile urethraWorld Journal of Urology, 2021
- Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi‐institutional cohort of patients with mid‐term follow‐upNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2018
- Complications and Interventions in Patients with an Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Long-Term ResultsJournal of Urology, 2018
- Decline in artificial urinary sphincter survival in modern practice—do we treat a different patient?Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2016
- Use, complications, and costs of stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancerCancer, 2016
- The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device SurvivalJournal of Urology, 2015
- Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failureWorld Journal of Urology, 2015
- The Artificial Urinary Sphincter After a Quarter of a Century: A Critical Systematic Review of Its Use in Male Non-neurogenic IncontinenceEuropean Urology, 2013