Systematic review and meta‐analysis: D‐Penicillamine vs. placebo/no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis – Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group
Open Access
- 28 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 24 (11-12) , 1535-1544
Abstract
D-Penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its ability to decrease hepatic copper and modulate the immune response. The results on effects of D--penicillamine in randomized-clinical trials of primary biliary cirrhosis patients are inconsistent. To systematically evaluate the benefits and harms of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We have performed a systematic review with meta-analyses of randomized-clinical trials to evaluate the effects of D-penicillamine for primary biliary cirrhosis. The primary outcomes are mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. We analysed the data by fixed-effect and random-effect models. Seven randomized trials including 706 patients were analysed. d-Penicillamine was without significant effects on mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.82-1.43, P = 0.56), mortality or liver transplantation (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.68, P = 0.62), pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage and liver biochemical variables. D--Penicillamine significantly decreased serum alanine aminotransferase activity (weighted mean difference -45 IU/L, 95% CI: -75 to -15, P < 0.05) and led to significantly more adverse events (RR 4.18, 95% CI: 1.38-12.69, P = 0.01). D-Penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality or morbidity, and led to more adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- The combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: The results of a pilot studyHepatology, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Trial of Penicillamine in Advanced Primary Biliary CirrhosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Low therapeutic value of D‐penicillamine in a short‐term prospective trial in primary biliary cirrhosisLiver International, 1983
- A Prospective Trial of D-Penicillamine in Primary Biliary CirrhosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Inhibition of Human Helper T Cell Function In Vitro by d-Penicillamine and CuSO4Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1980
- Reduction of Immune Complexes and Immunoglobulins Induced by D-Penicillamine in Primary Biliary CirrhosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979