Community of trauma care partnering with stakeholders to improve injury outcomes: focus group analysis
Open Access
- 8 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
- Vol. 9 (1) , e001274
Abstract
Introduction Engaging trauma survivors/caregivers results in research findings that are more relevant to patients’ needs and priorities. Although their perspectives increase research significance, there is a lack of understanding about how best to incorporate their insights. We aimed to capture stakeholder perspectives to ensure research is meaningful, respectful, and relevant to the injured patient and their caregivers. Methods A multiphase, inductive exploratory qualitative study was performed, the first phase of which is described here. Virtual focus groups to elicit stakeholder perspectives and preferences were conducted across 19 trauma centers in the USA during 2022. Discussion topics were chosen to identify patients’ motivation to join research studies, preferences regarding consent, suggestions for increasing diversity and access, and feelings regarding outcomes, efficacy, and exception from informed consent. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed to identify the range of perspectives expressed and any common themes that emerged. Results Ten 90-minute focus groups included patients/caregiver (n=21/1) and researchers (n=14). Data analysis identified common themes emerging across groups. The importance of trust and preexisting relationships with the clinical care team were the most common themes across all groups. Conclusion Our findings reveal common themes in preferences, motivations, and best practices to increase patient/caregiver participation in trauma research. The project’s next phases are distribution of a vignette-based survey to establish broad stakeholder consensus; education and dissemination activities to share strategies that increase research engagement and relevance for patients; and the formation of a panel of patients to support future research endeavors. Level of evidence Level IV.Keywords
Funding Information
- Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award (20933-CNTR)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized frameworkHealth Expectations, 2013
- Quality of Life After Severe Trauma: Results From the Global Trauma Trial With Recombinant Factor VIIJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2011
- Prevalence and Prognostic Factors of Disability After Major TraumaJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2011
- A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populationsBMC Public Health, 2010
- Impediments to Obtaining Informed Consent for Clinical Research in Trauma PatientsJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2008
- Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and TheoryHealth Services Research, 2007
- Predicting Quality of Life Six Months After Traumatic Injury2006
- Transitions to Caregiving, Gender, and Psychological Well‐Being: A Prospective U.S. National StudyJournal of Marriage and Family, 2002
- The Informed Consent Process and the Use of the Exception to Informed Consent in the Clinical Trial of DiaspirinAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Psychiatric and Physical Morbidity Effects of Dementia Caregiving: Prevalence, Correlates, and CausesThe Gerontologist, 1995