Are classifications of proximal radius fractures reproducible?
Open Access
- 1 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 10 (1) , 120
Abstract
Fractures of the proximal radius need to be classified in an appropriate and reproducible manner. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the three most widely used classification systems.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The incidence of associated fractures of the upper limb in fractures of the radial headStrategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 2008
- Documentation of Associated Injuries Occurring With Radial Head FractureClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Associated Injuries Complicating Radial Head FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Poor interobserver reliability of AO classification of fractures of the distal radius: Additional computed tomography is of minor valueThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1998
- Radial Head Fractures with Acute Distal Radioulnar DislocationClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1988
- Inter-examiner Reliability in Caries TrialsJournal of Dental Research, 1979
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale CodingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1955
- Dislocation of the inferior radio-ulnar jointBritish Journal of Surgery, 1946