Accuracy of guide wire placement for femoral neck stabilization using 3D printed drill guides
Open Access
- 4 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in 3D Printing in Medicine
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Background: The goal of stabilization of the femoral neck is to limit morbidity and mortality from fracture. Of three potential methods of fixation, (three percutaneous screws, the Synthes Femoral Neck System, and a dynamic hip screw), each requires guide wire positioning of the implant(s) in the femoral neck and head. Consistent and accurate positioning of these systems is paramount to reduce surgical times, stabilize fractures effectively, and reduce complications. To help expedite surgery and achieve ideal implant positioning in the geriatric population, we have developed and validated a surgical planning methodology using 3D modelling and printing technology. Methods: Using image processing software, 3D surgical models were generated placing guide wires in a virtual model of an osteoporotic proximal femur sawbone. Three unique drill guides were created to achieve the optimal position for implant placement for each of the three different implant systems, and the guides were 3D printed. Subsequently, a trauma fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon used the 3D printed guides to position 2.8 mm diameter drill bit tipped guide wires into five osteoporotic sawbones for each of the three systems (fifteen sawbones total). Computed Tomography (CT) scans were then taken of each of the sawbones with the implants in place. 3D model renderings of the CT scans were created using image processing techniques and the displacement and angular deviations at guide wire entry to the optimal sawbone model were measured. Results: Across all three percutaneous screw guide wires, the average displacement was 3.19 ± 0.12 mm and the average angular deviation was 4.10 ± 0.17o. The Femoral Neck System guide wires had an average displacement of 1.59 ± 0.18 mm and average angular deviation of 2.81 ± 0.64o. The Dynamic Hip Screw had an average displacement of 1.03 ± 0.19 mm and average angular deviation of 2.59 ± 0.39o. Conclusion: The use of custom 3D printed drill guides to assist with the positioning of guide wires proved to be accurate for each of the three types of surgical strategies. Guides which are used to place more than 1 guide wire may have lower positional accuracy, as the guide may shift during multiple wire insertions. We believe that personalized point of care drill guides provide an accurate intraoperative method for positioning implants into the femoral neck.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences,United States (UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863, UL1 TR001863)
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- 3D Printing Navigation Template Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the HipIndian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2020
- Three-dimensional-printing Technology in Hip and Pelvic Surgery: Current LandscapeHip & Pelvis, 2020
- Clinical Applications of 3‐Dimensional Printing Technology in Hip JointOrthopaedic Surgery, 2019
- Clinical value of 3D printing guide plate in core decompression plus porous bioceramics rod placement for the treatment of early osteonecrosis of the femoral headJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2018
- Biomechanical optimization of the angle and position for surgical implantation of a straight short stem hip implantMedical Engineering & Physics, 2016
- SchenkelhalsfrakturDer Unfallchirurg, 2015
- Revision Surgery Occurs Frequently After Percutaneous Fixation of Stable Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly PatientsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2014
- A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for Hip Surface Replacement Arthroplasty: description and first resultsBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2010
- Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacingThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2008
- OsteoporosisThe Lancet, 2006