Ratio of Cesarean Sections to Total Procedures as a Marker of District Hospital Trauma Capacity
- 25 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 36 (9) , 2074-2079
Abstract
There are few established metrics to define surgical capacity in resource-limited settings. Previous work hypothesizes that the relative frequency of cesarean sections (CS) at a hospital, expressed as a proportion of total operative procedures (%CS), may serve as a proxy measure of surgical capacity. We attempted to evaluate this hypothesis as it specifically relates to hospital capacity for emergency interventions for injury.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comprehensive national analysis of emergency and essential surgical capacity in RwandaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Standardised metrics for global surgical surveillanceThe Lancet, 2009
- Quantifying Surgical Capacity in Sierra LeoneArchives of Surgery, 2009
- Population Health Metrics for Surgery: Effective Coverage of Surgical Services in Low‐Income and Middle‐Income CountriesWorld Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Global surgery—defining a research agendaThe Lancet, 2008
- An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available dataThe Lancet, 2008
- The “Other” Neglected Diseases in Global Public Health: Surgical Conditions in Sub-Saharan AfricaPLOS Medicine, 2008
- Surgery and Global Health: A View from Beyond the ORWorld Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Africa's neglected surgical workforce crisisThe Lancet, 2008
- Maternal death and the Millennium Development Goals.2007