Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience
Author:
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 33 (2-3) , 433-456
Abstract
A neurologist with abdominal pain goes to see a gastroenterologist for treatment. The gastroenterologist asks the neurologist where it hurts. The neurologist replies, “In myhead, of course.” Indeed, while we can feel pain throughout much of our bodies, pain signals undergo most of their processing in the brain. Using neuroimaging techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (“fMRI”) and positron emission tomography (“PET”), researchers have more precisely identified brain regions that enable us to experience physical pain. Certain regions of the brain's cortex, for example, increase in activation when subjects are exposed to painful stimuli. Furthermore, the amount of activation increases with the intensity of the painful stimulus. These findings suggest that we may be able to gain insight into the amount of pain a particular person is experiencing by non-invasively imaging his brain.Such insight could be particularly valuable in the courtroom where we often have no definitive medical evidence to prove or disprove claims about the existence and extent of pain symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analgesic effect of watching TV during venipunctureArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2006
- Direct and fast detection of neuronal activation in the human brain with diffusion MRIProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging ResearchScience, 2006
- Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brainNature Neuroscience, 2005
- The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005
- Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of PainScience, 2004
- Standing Upright: The Moral and Legal Standing of Humans and Other ApesStanford Law Review, 2001
- Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applicationsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2001
- Psychiatric Neuroimaging Evidence: A High-Tech Crystal Ball?Stanford Law Review, 1997
- The Nonpecuniary Costs of Accidents: Pain-and-Suffering Damages in Tort LawHarvard Law Review, 1995