Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6
Open Access
- 26 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Microbial Cell Factories
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-16
Abstract
Acetic acid, an inhibitor of sugar fermentation by yeast, is invariably present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates which are used or considered as feedstocks for yeast-based bioethanol production. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains have been constructed, in which anaerobic reduction of acetic acid to ethanol replaces glycerol formation as a mechanism for reoxidizing NADH formed in biosynthesis. An increase in the amount of acetate that can be reduced to ethanol should further decrease acetic acid concentrations and enable higher ethanol yields in industrial processes based on lignocellulosic feedstocks. The stoichiometric requirement of acetate reduction for NADH implies that increased generation of NADH in cytosolic biosynthetic reactions should enhance acetate consumption. Replacement of the native NADP+-dependent 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in S. cerevisiae by a prokaryotic NAD+-dependent enzyme resulted in increased cytosolic NADH formation, as demonstrated by a ca. 15 % increase in the glycerol yield on glucose in anaerobic cultures. Additional deletion of ALD6, which encodes an NADP+-dependent acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, led to a 39 % increase in the glycerol yield compared to a non-engineered strain. Subsequent replacement of glycerol formation by an acetate reduction pathway resulted in a 44 % increase of acetate consumption per amount of biomass formed, as compared to an engineered, acetate-reducing strain that expressed the native 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and ALD6. Compared to a non-acetate reducing reference strain under the same conditions, this resulted in a ca. 13 % increase in the ethanol yield on glucose. The combination of NAD+-dependent 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase expression and deletion of ALD6 resulted in a marked increase in the amount of acetate that was consumed in these proof-of-principle experiments, and this concept is ready for further testing in industrial strains as well as in hydrolysates. Altering the cofactor specificity of the oxidative branch of the pentose-phosphate pathway in S. cerevisiae can also be used to increase glycerol production in wine fermentation and to improve NADH generation and/or generation of precursors derived from the pentose-phosphate pathway in other industrial applications of this yeast.Keywords
Funding Information
- DSM Bio-Based Products and Services B.V.
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systemsNucleic Acids Research, 2013
- amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette forSaccharomyces cerevisiaeFEMS Yeast Research, 2013
- Evaluation of Gene Modification Strategies for the Development of Low-Alcohol-Wine YeastsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012
- A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidationBMC Genomics, 2012
- Gpd1 and Gpd2 Fine-Tuning for Sustainable Reduction of Glycerol Formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011
- Elimination of Glycerol Production in Anaerobic Cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain Engineered To Use Acetic Acid as an Electron AcceptorApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010
- Codon-Optimized Bacterial Genes Improve l -Arabinose Fermentation in Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiaeApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008
- Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006
- Effects ofGPD1Overexpression inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCommercial Wine Yeast Strains LackingALD6GenesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006
- Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compoundsBiotechnology and Bioengineering, 2006