THE POTENTIAL FOR CRIME OVERREPORTING IN CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION SURVEYS
Author:
- 1 November 1976
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 307-330
Abstract
A critique is offered of’ the methodology of the criminal victimization survey and several sources of error that may result in artificially inflated crime rates based on such data are identified. It is argued that much information about crimes given by respondents may be incorrect due to misunderstandings about what transpired, ignorance about legal definitions, memory failures about when crimes occurred, and outright prefabrication. Organizational imperatives that may cause interviewers and coders to skew the data toward a showing of greater criminality are analyzed. Some ideas for measuring response error more precisely are presented.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Politics and Measures of Success in the War on CrimeCrime & Delinquency, 1975
- Interviewer Effect in a Survey of Drinking PracticesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1972
- Surveys of Population Samples for Estimating Crime IncidenceThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1967
- The Accuracy of Self-Reported Data and Prediction of Political ActivityPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1967
- The Validity of Income Reported by a Sample of Families Who Received Welfare Assistance during 1959Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- The Validity of Income Reported by a Sample of Families who Received Welfare Assistance During 1959Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- Studies of Interviewer Variance for Attitudinal VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- The Biasing Effect of Interviewer Expectations on Survey ResultPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1950
- The Cheater Problem in PollingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1945
- Do They Tell the Truth?Public Opinion Quarterly, 1944