Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet Oncology
- Vol. 18 (2) , 251-258
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost minimisation analysis of using acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) for breast reconstruction compared with standard techniquesEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2013
- Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™): Long-term outcomes and complicationsJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2013
- The Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Two-Stage Expander/Implant ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- Infectious Complications Associated With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Bilateral Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2012
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications Associated With Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2012
- The BREAST-QPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- The Effect of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Tissue Expander/Implant Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2010
- Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-QPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Breast Reconstruction after Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- A Prospective Assessment of Surgical Risk Factors in 400 Cases of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Implants to Establish Selection CriteriaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007