Corporate criminal law and organization incentives: a managerial perspective
Author:
Open Access
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Managerial and Decision Economics
- Vol. 21 (6) , 243-252
Abstract
Corporate criminal liability puts a serious challenge to the economic theory of enforcement. Are corporate crimes different from other crimes? Are these crimes best deterred by punishing individuals, punishing corporations, or both? What is optimal structure of sanctions? Should corporate liability be criminal or civil? This paper has two major contributions to the literature. First, it provides a common analytical framework to most results presented and largely discussed in the field. Second, by making use of the framework, we provide new insights into how corporations should be punished for the offenses committed by their employees. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incentive Contracts, Optimal Penalties and EnforcementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- On the Nature of the Reputational Penalty for Corporate Crime: EvidenceThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1999
- Management Turnover and Governance Changes Following the Revelation of FraudThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1999
- Did the Corporate Criminal Sentencing Guidelines Matter? Some Preliminary Empirical ObservationsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1999
- Regulating Corporate Criminal Sanctions: Federal Guidelines and the Sentencing of Public FirmsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1999
- Corporate CrimeThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1996
- Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve?Harvard Law Review, 1996
- The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal LiabilityThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1994
- The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal FraudThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1993
- Crime and Punishment: An Economic ApproachJournal of Political Economy, 1968