Getting the Numbers Right: International Engineering Education in the United States, China, and India
- 2 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Engineering Education
- Vol. 97 (1) , 13-25
Abstract
This article challenges the commonly cited statistics for engineering graduates in the United States, China, and India. Our research shows that the gap between the number of engineers and related technology specialists produced in the United States versus those in India and China is smaller than previously reported, and the United States remains a leading source of high‐quality global engineering talent. Furthermore, engineering graduates in China and India face the prospect of substantial unemployment, despite high corporate demand for their services; this raises questions about the quality of recent graduates. The United States, however, also confronts problems in its continued ability to attract and retain top engineering talent from abroad because of visa uncertainties and growing economic opportunities in their countries of origin. We argue that the key issue in engineering education should be the quality of graduates, not just the quantity, since quality factors have the biggest impact on innovation and entrepreneurship.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intellectual Property, the Immigration Backlog, and a Reverse Brain-Drain: America's New Immigrant Entrepreneurs, Part IIISSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- The Real Global Technology ChallengeChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2007
- Managing the global talent pool: Sovereignty, treaty, and intergovernmental networksTechnology in Society, 2006
- Graduate Employment in ChinaChina Information, 2006
- Graduate Unemployment: Dilemmas and Challenges in China's Move to Mass Higher EducationThe China Quarterly, 2006
- The India ModelForeign Affairs, 2006
- Framing the Engineering Outsourcing DebateSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten U.S. Economic Leadership?2005
- China’s higher education reform 1998–2003: A summaryAsia Pacific Education Review, 2004