Barriers and facilitators to the successful development, implementation and evaluation of care bundles in acute care in hospital: a scoping review
Open Access
- 6 May 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Implementation Science
- Vol. 14 (1) , 47
Abstract
Care bundles are small sets of evidence-based recommendations, designed to support the implementation of evidence-based best clinical practice. However, there is variation in the design and implementation of care bundles, which may impact on the fidelity of delivery and subsequently their clinical effectiveness. A scoping review was carried out using the Arksey and O’Malley framework to identify the literature reporting on the design, implementation and evaluation of care bundles. The Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched for manuscripts published between 2001 and November 2017; hand-searching of references and citations was also undertaken. Data were initially assessed using a quality assessment tool, the Downs and Black checklist, prior to further analysis and narrative synthesis. Implementation strategies were classified using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) criteria. Twenty-eight thousand six hundred ninety-two publications were screened and 348 articles retrieved in full text. Ninety-nine peer-reviewed quantitative publications were included for data extraction. These consisted of one randomised crossover trial, one randomised cluster trial, one case-control study, 20 prospective cohort studies and 76 non-parallel cohort studies. Twenty-three percent of studies were classified as poor based on Downs and Black checklist, and reporting of implementation strategies lacked structure. Negative associations were found between the number of elements in a bundle and compliance (Spearman’s rho = − 0.47, non-parallel cohort and − 0.65, prospective cohort studies), and between the complexity of elements and compliance (p < 0.001, chi-squared = 23.05). Implementation strategies associated with improved compliance included evaluative and iterative approaches, development of stakeholder relationships and education and training strategies. Care bundles with a small number of simple elements have better compliance rates. Standardised reporting of implementation strategies may help to implement care bundles into clinical practice with high fidelity. This review was registered on the PROSPERO database: CRD 42015029963 in December 2015.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reportingImplementation Science, 2013
- Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety programImplementation Science, 2013
- Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s frameworkBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid DesignsMedical Care, 2012
- A Hospital-wide Quality-Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Bloodstream InfectionsPediatrics, 2011
- Outcome effectiveness of the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle with addition of lactate clearance as a bundle item: a multi-national evaluationCritical Care, 2011
- Effectiveness of a catheter-associated bloodstream infection bundle in a Thai tertiary care center: A 3-year studyAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2010
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Improvement in Process of Care and Outcome After a Multicenter Severe Sepsis Educational Program in SpainJAMA, 2008
- Scoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005