The Use of Rapid Indicators for the Detection of Organic Residues on Clinically Used Gastrointestinal Endoscopes with and without Visually Apparent Debris
Authors:
- 1 August 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 35 (8) , 987-994
Abstract
Background: Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant organisms have been linked to endoscope reprocessing lapses. Meticulous manual cleaning before high-level disinfection (HLD) is essential in reducing residual contamination that can interfere with HLD. Current reprocessing guidelines state that visual inspection is sufficient to confirm adequate cleaning.Objective: Our aim was to evaluate contamination of clinically used endoscopes, using visual inspection and rapid indicator tests before and after manual cleaning. A second objective was to determine which rapid indicator instruments and methods could be used for quality improvement initiatives in endoscope reprocessing.Design: Clinical use study of endoscope reprocessing effectiveness.Setting: Tertiary care teaching hospital with an inpatient endoscopy center.Methods: Researchers sampled endoscopes used for gastrointestinal procedures before and after manual cleaning. The external surfaces and 1 channel of each endoscope were visually inspected and tested with rapid indicators to measure protein, blood, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) contamination levels.Results: Multiple components were sampled during 37 encounters with 12 unique endoscopes. All bedside-cleaned endoscopes had high levels of ATP and detectable blood or protein, whether or not any residue was visible. Although there was no visible residue on any endoscopes after manual cleaning, 82% had at least 1 positive rapid indicator test.Conclusions: Relying solely on visual inspection of endoscopes prior to HLD is insufficient to ensure reprocessing effectiveness. For quality assurance initiatives, tests of different endoscope components using more than 1 indicator may be necessary. Additional research is needed to validate specific monitoring protocols.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- New developments in reprocessing semicritical itemsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2013
- Current limitations about the cleaning of luminal endoscopesJournal of Hospital Infection, 2013
- Development and validation of rapid use scope test strips to determine the efficacy of manual cleaning for flexible endoscope channelsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2012
- Better Instructions for Use to Improve Reusable Medical Equipment (RME) SterilityHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2012
- Doubt and Proof: The Need to Verify The Cleaning ProcessBiomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 2012
- Multisociety Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible GI Endoscopes: 2011Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2011
- Evaluation of ATP Bioluminescence Assays for Potential Use in a Hospital SettingInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2011
- Control of a multi-hospital outbreak of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae type 2 in France, September to October 2009Eurosurveillance, 2010
- Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaningAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1999
- Patient-to-Patient Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus during ColonoscopyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997