DO WEALTH DIFFERENCES AFFECT FAIRNESS CONSIDERATIONS?*
- 11 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Economic Review
- Vol. 47 (2) , 391-429
Abstract
The influence of relative wealth on fairness considerations is analyzed in an ultimatum game experiment in which participants receive large and widely unequal initial endowments. Subjects initially demonstrate a concern for fairness. With time however, behavior becomes at odds with both subgame perfection and fairness. Evidence of learning is detected for both proposers and receivers in the estimation of a structural reinforcement learning model. The estimation results suggest that, guided by foregone best responses and an acquired sense of deservingness, rich subjects become more selfish, whereas poor subjects, influenced only by their own experience, learn to tolerate this behavior.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding Social Preferences with Simple TestsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002
- Reputation and Reciprocity: Consequences for the Labour RelationThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2002
- Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum gamesEconomic Inquiry, 2001
- Estimating Learning Models from Experimental DataSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and CooperationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- Which one should I imitate?Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1999
- Ultimatum bargaining by children and adultsJournal of Economic Psychology, 1998
- The Evolution of Walrasian BehaviorEconometrica, 1997
- On the failure to induce meager offers in ultimatum gameJournal of Economic Psychology, 1993
- An Outside Option ExperimentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989