The acceptability of a guided internet-based trauma-focused self-help programme (Spring) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Authors:
- Natalie SimonNSNatalie Simon
- Catrin E. LewisCLCatrin E. Lewis
- Kim SmallmanKSKim Smallman
- Lucy Brookes-HowellLBLucy Brookes-Howell
- Neil P. RobertsNRNeil P. Roberts
- Neil J. KitchinerNKNeil J. Kitchiner
- Cono AritiCACono Ariti
- Claire NollettCNClaire Nollett
- Rachel McNamaraRMRachel McNamara
- Jonathan I. BissonJBJonathan I. Bisson
Open Access
- 15 June 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Psychotraumatology
- Vol. 14 (2) , 2212554
Abstract
Background: Guided internet-based, cognitive behavioural therapy with a trauma-focus (i-CBT-TF) is recommended in guidelines for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There is limited evidence regarding its acceptability, with significant dropout from individual face-to-face CBT-TF, suggesting non-acceptability at least in some cases.Objective: To determine the acceptability of a guided internet-based CBT-TF intervention, 'Spring', in comparison with face-to-face CBT-TF for mild to moderate PTSD.Method: Treatment adherence, satisfaction, and therapeutic alliance were measured quantitatively for participants receiving 'Spring' or face-to-face CBT-TF as part of a Randomised Controlled Trial. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of therapists and participants.Results: 'Spring' guided internet-based CBT-TF was found to be acceptable, with over 89% participants fully or partially completing the programme. Therapy adherence and alliance for 'Spring' and face-to-face CBT-TF did not differ significantly, apart from post-treatment participant-reported alliance, which was in favour of face-to-face CBT-TF. Treatment satisfaction was high for both treatments, in favour of face-to-face CBT-TF. Interviews with participants receiving, and therapists delivering 'Spring' corroborated its acceptability.Conclusions: Guided internet-based CBT-TF is acceptable for many people with mild to moderate PTSD. Findings provide insights into future implementation, highlighting the importance of personalising guided self-help, depending on an individual's presentation, and preferences.Keywords
Funding Information
- UK National Institute for Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme (14/192/97)
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health researchBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: Reflections on the 2008 MRC guidanceInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2013
- A Systematic Review of PTSD Prevalence and Trajectories in DSM-5 Defined Trauma Exposed Populations: Intentional and Non-Intentional Traumatic EventsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Can't surf, won't surf: The digital divide in mental healthJournal of Mental Health, 2012
- Gender, trauma type, and PTSD prevalence: a re-analysis of 18 nordic convenience samplesAnnals of General Psychiatry, 2012
- CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health InterventionsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- Prevalence and Axis I comorbidity of full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Results from Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related ConditionsJournal of Anxiety Disorders, 2011
- Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trialsJournal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2011
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001