Sovereign Debt, Government Myopia, and the Financial Sector
Authors:
- 2 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 26 (6) , 1526-1560
Abstract
What determines the sustainability of sovereign debt? We develop a model where myopic governments seek popularity but can nevertheless commit credibly to service external debt. They do not default when debt is low because they would lose access to debt markets and be forced to reduce spending; they do not default as debt builds up and net new borrowing becomes difficult, because of the adverse consequences from default to the domestic financial sector. More myopic governments default less often, but tax in a more distortionary way and increase the vulnerability of the domestic financial sector to future government debt default.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Pyrrhic Victory? - Bank Bailouts and Sovereign Credit Risk2011
- Growth in the Shadow of Expropriation *The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011
- Systemic Sovereign Credit Risk: Lessons from the U.S. and Europe2011
- Sovereign Default Risk and Bank Fragility in Financially Integrated Economies2011
- How Costly is Sovereign Default? Evidence from Financial MarketsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Sovereign Risk and Secondary MarketsAmerican Economic Review, 2010
- Default Risk and Income Fluctuations in Emerging EconomiesAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- Models of Sovereign Debt: Partial Versus General ReputationsInternational Economic Review, 1998
- A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign DebtJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- Sovereign Debt: Is To Forgive To Forget?1988