Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 387 (10027) , 1573-1586
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial PublicationsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical PublicationsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research JournalsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Adequacy of Published Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials to Provide Therapeutic Details Needed for Clinical ApplicationJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- From Quality of Publication to Quality of Care: Translating Trials to PracticeJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of EfficacyPLOS Biology, 2010
- Funding of US Biomedical Research, 2003-2008JAMA, 2010
- Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using AnimalsPLOS ONE, 2009
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2009
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceThe Lancet, 2009