The decentralisation-centralisation dilemma: recruitment and distribution of health workers in remote districts of Tanzania
Open Access
- 30 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC International Health and Human Rights
- Vol. 9 (1) , 9
Abstract
The implementation of decentralisation reforms in the health sector of Tanzania started in the 1980s. These reforms were intended to relinquish substantial powers and resources to districts to improve the development of the health sector. Little is known about the impact of decentralisation on recruitment and distribution of health workers at the district level. Reported difficulties in recruiting health workers to remote districts led the Government of Tanzania to partly re-instate central recruitment of health workers in 2006. The effects of this policy change are not yet documented. This study highlights the experiences and challenges associated with decentralisation and the partial re-centralisation in relation to the recruitment and distribution of health workers. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted among informants recruited from five underserved, remote districts of mainland Tanzania. Additional informants were recruited from the central government, the NGO sector, international organisations and academia. A comparison of decentralised and the reinstated centralised systems was carried out in order to draw lessons necessary for improving recruitment, distribution and retention of health workers. The study has shown that recruitment of health workers under a decentralised arrangement has not only been characterised by complex bureaucratic procedures, but by severe delays and sometimes failure to get the required health workers. The study also revealed that recruitment of highly skilled health workers under decentralised arrangements may be both very difficult and expensive. Decentralised recruitment was perceived to be more effective in improving retention of the lower cadre health workers within the districts. In contrast, the centralised arrangement was perceived to be more effective both in recruiting qualified staff and balancing their distribution across districts, but poor in ensuring the retention of employees. A combination of centralised and decentralised recruitment represents a promising hybrid form of health sector organisation in managing human resources by bringing the benefits of two worlds together. In order to ensure that the potential benefits of the two approaches are effectively integrated, careful balancing defining the local-central relationships in the management of human resources needs to be worked out.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring inequalities in the distribution of health workers: the case of TanzaniaHuman Resources for Health, 2009
- For public service or money: understanding geographical imbalances in the health workforceHealth Policy and Planning, 2007
- Geographic aspects of poverty and health in Tanzania: does living in a poor area matter?Health Policy and Planning, 2005
- Health systems decentralization and human resources management in low and middle income countriesPublic Administration and Development, 2002
- Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?BMJ, 2001
- Vertical or holistic decentralization of the health sector? Experiences from Zambia and UgandaThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2000
- Decentralization of health services in Western Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea: An attempt to administer health service at the subdistrict levelSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Health sector reforms in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons of the last 10 yearsHealth Policy, 1995
- Decentralization and accountability in the health sector from an international perspective: What are the choices?Public Administration and Development, 1994
- Linking decentralization and centralization: A critique of the new development administrationPublic Administration and Development, 1992