Best practice guidelines for environmental DNA biomonitoring in Australia and New Zealand
Authors:
- Maarten De BrauwerMBMaarten De Brauwer
- Laurence J. ClarkeLCLaurence J. Clarke
- Anthony CharitonACAnthony Chariton
- Madalyn K. CooperMCMadalyn K. Cooper
- Mark de BruynMBMark de Bruyn
- Elise FurlanEFElise Furlan
- Anna J. MacDonaldAMAnna J. MacDonald
- Meaghan L. RourkeMRMeaghan L. Rourke
- Leonie SuterLSLeonie Suter
- Cecilia Villacorta‐RathCVCecilia Villacorta‐Rath
- Anastasija ZaikoAZAnastasija Zaiko
Open Access
- 7 February 2023
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Environmental DNA
- Vol. 5 (3) , 417-423
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based methods are increasingly used by government agencies to detect pests and threatened species, and for broader biodiversity monitoring. Given rapid technological advances and a growing number of commercial service providers, there is a need to standardize methods for quality assurance and to maintain confidence in eDNA‐based results. Here, we introduce two documents to provide best‐practice guidelines for Australian and New Zealand eDNA researchers and end‐users (available from https://sednasociety.com/publications): the Environmental DNA protocol development guide for biomonitoring provides minimum standard considerations for eDNA and environmental RNA projects across the complete workflow, from ethical considerations and experimental design to interpreting and communicating results. The Environmental DNA test validation guidelines outline key steps to be used in assay development and validation for species‐specific testing and metabarcoding. Both guidelines were developed as an initiative of the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and led by the Southern eDNA Society in a collaborative process including multiple consultation rounds with eDNA experts, end‐users, and stakeholders to adapt the guidelines to Australian and New Zealand needs. The aim of these guidelines is not to be prescriptive, but to set minimum standards to support a consistent and best‐practice approach to eDNA testing. We anticipate that the guidelines will be reviewed and regularly updated as required. Our aspiration is that these best‐practice guidelines will ensure environmental managers are provided with robust scientific evidence to support decision‐making.Keywords
Funding Information
- Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian Government
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Release and degradation of environmental DNA and RNA in a marine systemScience of The Total Environment, 2020
- A united front against marine invaders: Developing a cost‐effective marine biosecurity surveillance partnership between government and industryJournal of Applied Ecology, 2019
- Can we manage fisheries with the inherent uncertainty from eDNA?Journal of Fish Biology, 2019
- Refinement of eDNA as an early monitoring tool at the landscape‐level: study design considerationsEcological Applications, 2019
- DNA metabarcoding—Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusionsMolecular Ecology, 2019
- Downstream transport and seasonal variation in freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) eDNA concentrationEnvironmental DNA, 2019
- Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNABiological Conservation, 2015
- Environmental Conditions Influence eDNA Persistence in Aquatic SystemsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2014
- From molecules to management: Adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environmentsEnvironmental Research, 2011
- The science and application of ecological monitoringBiological Conservation, 2010