Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal status
Authors:
- Ayten TanATAyten Tan
- Serpil ÇokakoğluSÇSerpil Çokakoğlu
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation) in The Angle Orthodontist
- Vol. 90 (3) , 339-346
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of adhesive precoated (APC) flash-free brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal status in patients during fixed orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients, age 12 to 18 years, who had Angle Class I or Class II malocclusion with mild to moderate crowding in the permanent dentition were selected for this study. APC flash-free and conventional ceramic brackets were bonded for a split-mouth study design. The quadrant allocation was randomized. Demineralization records were obtained immediately after bonding (T0), 1 month after bonding (T1), and 6 months after bonding (T2). Clinical periodontal measurements, including gingival index, plaque index, and bleeding upon probing, were obtained before bonding (T0) and at the same time points (T1 and T2). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests to compare parameters between groups and times. Results: Demineralization values decreased on most sides of the brackets for both groups between T0 and T1. In the conventional group, there was significantly higher demineralization on more sides compared with flash-free brackets between T1 and T2. With one exception, the decreased values were found in the incisal/occlusal sides of all brackets at T2. All periodontal parameters showed significant increases after 6 months of treatment in both groups. Intergroup comparison showed no significant differences in demineralization or periodontal measurements at any of the time points. Conclusions: The effects of APC flash-free and conventional brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal health did not differ from each other.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trialThe Angle Orthodontist, 2019
- Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trialAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2018
- Comparaison du joint de colle entre les attaches préencollées APC™ PLUS et les attaches APC™ Flash-FreeL'Orthodontie Française, 2018
- A new flash-free orthodontic adhesive system: A first clinical and stereomicroscopic studyThe Angle Orthodontist, 2016
- Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliancesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010
- Enamel Demineralization during Fixed Orthodontic Treatment – Incidence and Correlation to Various Oral-hygiene ParametersJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2007
- Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-near-olds: A study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1989
- Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliancesEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1986
- Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1982
- Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and bandingAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1982