Inbred Substrain Differences Influence Neuroimmune Response and Drinking Behavior
- 2 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
- Vol. 44 (9) , 1760-1768
Abstract
Background: The inbred mouse strain C57BL/6 is widely used in both models of addiction and immunological disease. However, there are pronounced phenotypic differences in ethanol (EtOH) consumption and innate immune response between C57BL/6 substrains. The focus of this study was to examine the effects of substrain on innate immune response and neuroimmune‐induced escalation of voluntary EtOH consumption. The main goal was to identify whether substrain differences in immune response can account for differences in EtOH behavior.Methods: We compared acute innate immune response with a viral dsRNA mimic, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), in brain using qRT‐PCR in both C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice. Next, we used a neuroimmune model of escalation using poly(I:C) to compare drinking behavior between substrains. Finally, we compared brain neuroimmune response with both EtOH and repeated poly(I:C) in both substrains as a way to account for differences in EtOH behavior.Results: We found that C57BL/6 substrains have differing immune response and drinking behaviors. C57BL/6N mice have a shorter but more robust inflammatory response to acute poly(I:C). In contrast, C57BL/6J mice have a smaller but longer‐lasting acute immune response to poly(I:C). In our neuroimmune‐induced escalation model, C57BL/6J mice but not C57BL/6N mice escalate EtOH intake after poly(I:C). Finally, only C57BL/6J mice show enhanced proinflammatory transcript abundance after poly(I:C) and EtOH, suggesting that longer‐lasting immune responses are critical to neuroimmune drinking phenotypes.Conclusions: Altogether, this work has elucidated additional influences that substrain has on both innate immune response and drinking phenotypes. Our observations highlight the importance of considering and reporting the source and background used for production of transgenic and knockout mice. These data provide further evidence that genetic background must be carefully considered when investigating the role of neuroimmune signaling in EtOH abuse.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strainsGenome Biology, 2013
- Gene Expression in Brain and Liver Produced by Three Different Regimens of Alcohol Consumption in Mice: Comparison with Immune ActivationPLOS ONE, 2013
- Chronic ethanol increases systemic TLR3 agonist-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegenerationJournal of Neuroinflammation, 2012
- Cutting Edge: NLRP12 Controls Dendritic and Myeloid Cell Migration To Affect Contact HypersensitivityThe Journal of Immunology, 2010
- The InflammasomesCell, 2010
- Alcohol trait and transcriptional genomic analysis of C57BL/6 substrainsGenes, Brain and Behavior, 2008
- Mutations in NALP12 cause hereditary periodic fever syndromesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decadesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Characterization of the ethanol-deprivation effect in substrains of C57BL/6 miceAlcohol, 2006
- Whole brain methionine-enkephalin of ethanol-avoiding and ethanol-preferring C57BL miceCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1982