Vestibular schwannoma management
Authors:
- L. Dade LunsfordLLL. Dade Lunsford
- Douglas KondziolkaDKDouglas Kondziolka
- Raymond SekulaRSRaymond Sekula
- Brian R. SubachBSBrian R. Subach
- Robert L. FooteRFRobert L. Foote
- John C. FlickingerJFJohn C. Flickinger
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 89 (6) , 949-955
Abstract
Object. The indications, operative findings, and outcomes of vestibular schwannoma microsurgery are controversial when it is performed after stereotactic radiosurgery. To address these issues, the authors reviewed the experience at two academic medical centers. Methods. During a 10-year interval, 452 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Thirteen patients (2.9%) underwent delayed microsurgery at a median of 27 months (range 7–72 months) after they had undergone radiosurgery. Six of the 13 patients had undergone one or more microsurgical procedures before they underwent radiosurgery. The indications for surgery were tumor enlargement with stable symptoms in five patients, tumor enlargement with new or increased symptoms in five patients, and increased symptoms without evidence of tumor growth in three patients. Gross-total resection was achieved in seven patients and near-gross-total resection in four patients. The surgery was described as more difficult than that typically performed for schwannoma in eight patients, no different in four patients, and easier in one patient. At the last follow-up evaluation, three patients had normal or near-normal facial function, three patients had moderate facial dysfunction, and seven had facial palsies. Three patients were incapable of caring for themselves, and one patient died of progression of a malignant triton tumor. Conclusions. Failed radiosurgery in cases of vestibular schwannoma was rare. No clear relationship was demonstrated between the use of radiosurgery and the subsequent ease or difficulty of delayed microsurgery. Because some patients have temporary enlargement of their tumor after radiosurgery, the need for surgical resection after radiosurgery should be reviewed with the neurosurgeon who performed the radiosurgery and should be delayed until sustained tumor growth is confirmed. A subtotal tumor resection should be considered for patients who require surgical resection of their tumor after vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preliminary results of linear accelerator radiosurgery for acoustic schwannomasJournal of Neurosurgery, 1996
- Evolution in technique for vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery and effect on outcomeInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 1996
- Radiosurgery: a minimally interventional alternative to microsurgery in the management of acoustic neuromaBritish Journal Of Neurosurgery, 1996
- Stereotactic radiosurgery using the gamma knife for acoustic neuromasInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 1995
- Outcome Analysis of Acoustic Neuroma Management: A Comparison of Microsurgery and Stereotactic RadiosurgeryNeurosurgery, 1995
- Malignant triton tumor of the acoustic nerveJournal of Neurosurgery, 1992
- Radical intracapsular removal of acoustic neurinomasJournal of Neurosurgery, 1991
- Residual and recurrent acoustic neuromasThe Laryngoscope, 1987
- Malignant triton tumour in the cerebellopontine angleActa Neuropathologica, 1987
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Cases of Acoustic Neurinoma: Further ExperiencesNeurosurgery, 1983