Anatomical Variations of the Trigeminal Arachnoid Membrane: Implications for Microvascular Decompression Surgery in Trigeminal Neuralgia
- 2 June 2025
- journal article
- original study-anatomic
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Vol. 36 (6) , 2117-2120
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the anatomic variations of the trigeminal arachnoid membrane (TM) and evaluate its implications for microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Understanding the structural variations of TM is essential for improving surgical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 377 TN patients who underwent MVD between January 2017 and December 2023. Intraoperative video recordings were reviewed to classify the TM into 4 subtypes based on consistency, opacity, and thickness. Patients were followed for at least 10 months, with surgical techniques, including trigeminal nerve isolation, utilized to manage neurovascular conflicts and arachnoid adhesions. Results: The TM was classified into 4 subtypes: absent (10.3%), filamentous (41.1%), membranous (43.5%), and thickened (5.1%). Neurovascular conflicts were present in 97.3% of cases, with the superior cerebellar artery being the most common offending vessel. TM subtypes influenced the complexity of the surgery, with thicker and more opaque TMs presenting challenges in visualization and nerve decompression. Conclusions: The anatomic variations of TM play a critical role in MVD for TN. Understanding these subtypes enables more precise surgical planning, potentially reducing complications and recurrence. Standardized protocols for managing arachnoid membranes could improve outcomes and reduce the recurrence of TN symptoms. Future research should focus on developing advanced surgical tools and techniques to address the challenges posed by TM, particularly the thickened subtype.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- External Neurolysis in Microvascular Decompression for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Negative Idiopathic Trigeminal NeuralgiaWorld Neurosurgery, 2022
- Operative findings and outcome of microvascular decompression/adhesiolysis for trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis without demyelinating brain stem lesionsClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2021
- Efficacy of microvascular decompression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia with negative neurovascular relationship shown by magnetic resonance tomographyClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2020
- Arachnoiditis as an outcome factor for microvascular decompression in classical trigeminal neuralgiaActa Neurochirurgica, 2019
- Arachnoid Membranes Around the Cisternal Segment of the Trigeminal Nerve: A Cadaveric Anatomic Study and Intraoperative Observations During Minimally Invasive Microvascular Decompression SurgeryWorld Neurosurgery, 2019
- Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with no neurovascular compression: A retrospective study and literature reviewJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2018
- Endoscopic approach-routes in the posterior fossa cisterns through the retrosigmoid keyhole craniotomy: an anatomical studyNeurosurgical Review, 2016
- Trigeminal neuralgia due to venous neurovascular conflicts: outcome after microvascular decompression in a series of 55 consecutive patientsActa Neurochirurgica, 2016
- Role of the blood vessel and arachnoid as conflicting structures during microvascular decompression for treating typical trigeminal neuralgiaFormosan Journal of Surgery, 2016
- Anatomical Observations During Microvascular Decompression for Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia (with Correlations Between Topography of Pain and Site of the Neurovascular Conflict). Prospective Study in a Series of 579 PatientsActa Neurochirurgica, 2002