COVID-19: a catalyst for the digitization of surgical teaching at a German University Hospital
Open Access
- 22 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 22 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
Background: The summer semester 2020, had to be restructured due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the associated contact restrictions. Here, for the first time, the established lectures in lecture halls and small group seminars could not be conducted in presence as usual. A possible tool for the implementation of medical teaching, offers the use of eLearning, online webinars and learning platforms. At present it is unclear how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will affect surgical teaching, how digitization will be accepted by students, and how virtual teaching can be expanded in the future. Methods: The teaching, which was previously delivered purely through face-to-face lectures, was completely converted to digital media. For this purpose, all lectures were recorded and were available to students on demand. The seminars were held as a twice a week occurring online webinar. The block internship was also conducted as a daily online webinar and concluded with an online exam at the end. At the end of the semester, a survey of the students was carried out, which was answered by n = 192 students with an anonymized questionnaire. The questionnaire inquires about the previous and current experience with eLearning, as well as the possibility of a further development towards a purely digital university. Results: There were n = 192 students in the study population. For 88%, the conversion of classes to web-based lectures represented their first eLearning experience. For 77% of all students, the digitization of teaching led to a change in the way they prepare for class. 73% of the participating students are of the opinion that eLearning lectures should continue to be offered. 54% of the students felt that eLearning lectures made more sense than face-to-face lectures. A purely virtual university could be imagined by 41% of the students. Conclusion: The conversion of teaching represented the first contact with eLearning for most students. Overall, the eLearning offering was experienced as positive. Due to the new teaching structure, the way of learning had already changed during the semester. Based on the new eLearning content, the already existing formats can be further expanded in the future. Nevertheless, it turned out that the practical-surgical contents and skills cannot be adequately represented by purely online offers; for this, the development of hybrid practice-oriented teaching concepts is necessary.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education CollaborationJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2019
- Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education – an integrative reviewBMC Medical Education, 2018
- Webinar-Based Contouring Education for ResidentsJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2017
- Reality Check: Basics of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed RealityMedical Reference Services Quarterly, 2017
- Virtually NursingNurse Educator, 2017
- The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issuesEducation and Information Technologies, 2015
- Implementing distance teaching at a large scale in medical education: A struggle between dominant and non-dominant teaching activitiesEducation and Information Technologies, 2013
- Integrating Evidence Based Medicine Into Undergraduate Medical Education: Combining Online Instruction With Clinical ClerkshipsTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2010
- Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomised controlled trialBMC Medical Education, 2007
- Perceptions on the importance of gerontological education by teachers and students of undergraduate health sciencesBMC Medical Education, 2007