Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses
Authors:
- Kevin M. BellKBKevin M. Bell
- Erik C. FrazierEFErik C. Frazier
- Charise M. ShivelyCSCharise M. Shively
- Robert A. HartmanRHRobert A. Hartman
- James C. UlibarriJUJames C. Ulibarri
- Joon Y. LeeJLJoon Y. Lee
- James D. KangJKJames D. Kang
- William F. DonaldsonWDWilliam F. Donaldson
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 9 (3) , 225-231
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Motion in the unstable cervical spine: comparison of manual turning and use of the Jackson table in prone positioningJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2007
- Reduction in Head and Intervertebral Motion Provided by 7 Contemporary Cervical Orthoses in 45 IndividualsSpine, 2007
- Zervikalstützen: Eine klinische und biomechanische StudieZeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete, 2004
- Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: A comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthosesJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2003
- Comparison of the Nebraska Collar, a New Prototype Cervical Immobilization Collar, With Three Standard ModelsJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1998
- LetterSpine, 1998
- Efficacy of Five Cervical Orthoses in Restricting Cervical MotionSpine, 1997
- The Effect of a Soft Collar, Used as Normally Recommended or Reversed, on Three Planes of Cervical Range of MotionJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1996
- Comparison of Prehospital Cervical Immobilization Devices Using Video and ElectromyographyPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 1995
- Review of Cervical OrthosesPhysical Therapy, 1978